The fact that you attribute the material to the other author does not change that. Having said that, crediting your source will decrease the chances of litigation, since the original author may feel that he or she received appropriate credit. The more material you lift from the original, the less likely it is that your use will be considered a fair use. As a broad standard, never quote more than a few successive paragraphs from a book or article, take more than one chart or diagram, include an illustration or other artwork in a book or newsletter without the artist's permission, or quote more than one or two lines from a poem.
Contrary to what many people believe, there is no absolute word limit on fair use. For example, copying words from a work of words wouldn't be fair use. However, copying 2, words from a work of , words might be fair.
It all depends on the circumstances. To preserve the free flow of information, authors are given more leeway when using material from factual works scholarly, technical, or scientific works than works of fancy, such as novels, poems, and plays. The more important the material is to the original work, the less likely your use of it will be considered fair.
In one famous case, The Nation magazine obtained a copy of Gerald Ford's memoirs before their publication. In the magazine's article about the memoirs, only words from Ford's ,word manuscript were quoted verbatim. The Supreme Court ruled that this was not a fair use because the material quoted dealing with the Nixon pardon was the "heart of the book In determining whether your intended use of another author's protected work constitutes a fair use, apply the golden rule: Take from someone else only what you would not mind someone taking from you.
This will help, should you ever need to defend your actions in court. When it comes to fair use, unpublished works are inherently different from published works. Publishing an author's unpublished work before he or she has authorized it infringes upon the author's right to decide when and whether the work will be made public. Some courts in the past held that fair use never applies to unpublished material. However, in Congress amended the fair use provision of the U.
Copyright Act to make clear that the fact that a work is unpublished weighs against fair use, but is not determinative in and of itself. The information provided on this site is not legal advice, does not constitute a lawyer referral service, and no attorney-client or confidential relationship is or will be formed by use of the site.
The attorney listings on this site are paid attorney advertising. In some states, the information on this website may be considered a lawyer referral service. Please reference the Terms of Use and the Supplemental Terms for specific information related to your state.
Multiple copying is permitted: e. Differences between photocopying under "fair dealing" and under the CLA licence There is a substantial overlap between photocopying under "fair dealing" for private study or research and photocopying under the CLA licence.
External Library users who wish to photocopy items must rely on "fair dealing" for private study or research, or on one of the copyright provisions that allow material to be copied in order to reproduce it in another work see Reproduction of Library materials. What can be copied: any literary , dramatic , musical or artistic work can be photocopied under "fair dealing" for definitions of these terms, see What is copyright - and why it matters.
There are limits to which works can be copied under the CLA licence, and these limits are based on the category of work e. If the item which you want to photocopy is not covered by the CLA licence, it will have to be copied under "fair dealing" or one of the provisions relating to the Reproduction of Library materials. How much can be copied: the extent limits for photocopying under the CLA licence and under "fair dealing" appear essentially the same. However, the recommended limits for copying under "fair dealing" are simply that: recommendations based on library sector practice, the views of writers on copyright and guidance issued by other institutions.
There is no way of predicting what the courts will decide is a "fair" amount in the event of a dispute. By contrast, the CLA licence sets down definite limits on how much can be photocopied and therefore provides a greater degree of certainty. The purpose of photocopying: to be legal, photocopying under "fair dealing" must be for the purpose of non-commercial private study or research.
Is news footage fair use? Is it legal to use clips from movies? Is it legal to use news footage? Can I use news footage in my music video? How much does archive footage cost? What is fair use for video? Do I need permission to show a YouTube video? Is a copyright claim bad? Can copyright claim be removed? Previous Article Will there always be a need for teachers?
Next Article What is the best example of how the nervous system maintains homeostasis? If you are copying material for use in a course, fair dealing allows for limited copying of short excerpts of copyright protected works. The material copied can only be distributed to students engaged in a specific course of study at SFU and cannot be made available to those not in the class.
The short excerpt can be made available as a class handout or email ; in Canvas; or as part of a coursepack. See below, and refer to the Copyright Information Graphic for details.
0コメント